Are SAFE Investments Really Safe?

nat rosasco • July 26, 2018

Originally created for accredited investors in 2013, the simple agreement for future equity, or “SAFE,” has become a popular crowdfunding tool for attracting all investor-types. With a SAFE, the company takes in capital investment with the promise that it will return equity to investors upon a significant event, such as a buy-out, merger or preferred stock offering. The SAFE seems ideal for crowdfunding because the company’s lack of a then-current legal obligation to SAFE investors reduces the paperwork and maneuvering necessary to keep the founders in control of their business.

 

But is the SAFE really a safe investment? If you equate that to mean a guaranteed return, then no, the SAFE is certainly not safe. In fact, the SEC issued its own alert[1] to warn investors of the pitfalls in using a SAFE investment. After all, the SAFE is an investment, and all investments come with risk. In this article, I’ll explain how the SAFE differs from traditional investments and outline some issues for you to keep in mind when considering your own SAFE investment.

 

The SAFE is its own unique investment vehicle.

A good place to start understanding the SAFE is to realize what it isn’t. People tend to lump investments into one of two categories: debt and equity. The SAFE is neither.

 

When you invest your money with a SAFE, you’re not giving the company a loan and the company isn’t handing you a note. In fact, the company has no legal obligation to pay you if the future events that trigger your return never happen. And, unlike a loan, your SAFE investment doesn’t accrue any interest no matter how long you wait for those future events.

 

A SAFE investment also won’t grant you any stake in the company. At the time of your investment, the company hands you a promise for future equity if the company realizes a certain event. If that event never happens, you don’t get equity. Your SAFE also doesn’t get you voting rights or other similar perks that typically come along with an equity investment. When investing with a SAFE, you literally hand over your money to the founders and, well, you wait. So, don’t expect your SAFE to provide returns like a traditional debt or equity investment.

 

To be fair, your SAFE investment can become equity at some point, but you definitely do not have any stake in the company at the time you make your investment. If – and only if – the company triggers a defined future event, then – and only then – will your investment convert to a stake in the company.

 

What to watch out for when considering a SAFE.

First and foremost, you must understand the future events that will trigger your return As I mentioned previously, typical SAFE triggers include a buy-out, merger, and preferred stock offering, and other events that generally involve a significant influx of outside capital. But don’t assume the SAFE you’re considering covers every scenario in which the company is doing well. For example, if the company is earning income by selling its products or services, then your SAFE return may not be triggered even though the company is making money. Remember, your stake only vests when those triggers defined in the SAFE actually occur, not necessarily when the company becomes successful.

 

There are other issues to spot when reviewing a SAFE, especially in the crowdfunding realm. Consider the impact of the number of investors likely to join you in a SAFE investment crowdfunding offering. In that scenario, the company will likely not want to negotiate with hundreds of investors to later modify the SAFE terms. After all, startups change considerably over short periods of time and SAFEs have no expiration. Check to see if the SAFE designates one investor or subset of investors with the power to amend the SAFE for all of the investors. The SAFE may identify this lead investor or investor group by its investment amount, thus creating majority and minority investors within the SAFE.

 

You should also be aware of repurchase rights. Your SAFE may provide the company with the option to pay you for your investment even after a triggering event. In that case, understand how the company values your investment. Be wary of the company undervaluing your investment by using either its own method or through an appraiser of its choosing. Also, review any future limitation on your potential equity stake, such as reduced voting rights. All equity isn’t necessarily created equal.

 

The SAFE can be a viable investment option that helps startups succeed and genuinely rewards investors when the company is successful. It could fit your budget and goals, and allow you to participate in a company you believe in. Just make sure to read, understand and scrutinize the terms of the SAFE you’re considering, and ask a professional for help before making a significant investment that may not align with your expectations.


[1]
 https://www.sec.gov/oiea/investor-alerts-and-bulletins/ib_safes

By nat rosasco February 25, 2021
As this relentlessly awful year mercifully draws to a close, a light at the end of our pandemic tunnel is rapidly approaching. COVID-19 vaccines are poised for approval, and it is expected that distribution will begin in earnest shortly. But no matter how much and how confidently the FDA and other health experts proclaim these vaccines to be safe and effective, there are large numbers of Americans who say they won’t get the shot when it becomes available. The most recent Gallup poll found that only 63 percent of Americans say they are willing to be inoculated against the disease. Many of those who don’t want to get vaccinated will soon find out that they work for an employer who feels differently. Those employers may also tell them that they either need to get the vaccine or need to find a new job. And, in most cases, employers may be well within their rights to terminate employees who refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine. Mandatory Vaccinations Are Not New Companies that have spent the better part of the year – and lots of money - trying to keep their workplaces COVID-free see the vaccine as the apex of those efforts. With a fully vaccinated workforce, business owners can operate without disruption and provide employees, customers, clients, and patients with confidence and peace of mind. But all of those benefits of the vaccine only accrue to fully vaccinated workforces. So, many companies may mandate that employees get their shot as a condition of continued employment. By doing so, they are following a legally sound path that predates the current pandemic. Well before anyone had heard of coronavirus, plenty of employers, primarily in the health care sector, required employees to get the flu vaccine and vaccinations against other infectious diseases. Most public school districts also require proof of vaccinations before a student can enroll and attend classes. Since most employees in Illinois work on an “at-will” basis, they can face termination for almost any reason not expressly prohibited by federal, state, or local laws. Generally, no law stands in the way of an employer requiring the COVID-19 vaccine for its workers. ADA and Religious Exceptions However, employers who make vaccines mandatory need to be mindful that employees with legitimate health or religious concerns about the vaccine may be protected from termination and other adverse employment actions if they refuse the shot. But these exceptions don’t necessarily apply just because someone doesn’t believe in vaccines generally (“anti-vaxers”) or thinks that forcing them to get vaccination is an infringement on their liberties. Employees who have a disability recognized under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that prevents them from taking the coronavirus vaccine cannot be forced to get the vaccine, so long as their exemption does not impose an “undue hardship” on the employer. Such disabilities in this context may include a compromised immune system or an allergy to an ingredient in the vaccine. While there has been no definitive guidance on the subject, one could credibly argue that an employee’s refusal to get vaccinated is an “undue hardship” if it places the health and safety of other employees and visitors at increase risk of infection. Even in such cases, however, an employer may need to make a “reasonable accommodation” for the employee, such as allowing them to work from home. Similarly, the anti-discrimination provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 may protect a worker if their “sincerely-held religious beliefs” preclude them from getting a vaccination. Such beliefs do not include political or personal views. The burden is on the employee to demonstrate the legitimacy of their religious objections to the vaccine. More Than Legal Issues To Consider Even when an employer is within their legal rights to require employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine, other considerations may weigh against such a mandate. For example, they may need protection against an employee who has an adverse reaction, even if they signed a waiver upon receiving the shot. A vaccination requirement may also get an adverse reaction from employees generally as well as the general public if it seems heavy-handed and overreaching. Of course, those that decide against a mandate face risks if someone does contract the coronavirus in the workplace and sues. Please Contact Grogan Hesse & Uditsky With All Of Your COVID-Related Employment Questions If you have questions or concerns about how to handle vaccinations or other employment issues related to COVID-19, please call us at (630) 833-5533 or contact us online to arrange for a consultation.
By nat rosasco January 11, 2021
The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) is back , offering a second round of loan forgiveness to new borrowers and qualified second-time PPP borrowers. The second round of PPP loans has earmarked up to $284 billion to support business owners' payroll costs and other eligible expenses through March 31, 2021. Loans will be available to first-time participants on Monday, January 11, and existing PPP participants on Wednesday, January 13. First Draw PPP Loan Eligibility Borrowers that did not participate in the first round are generally eligible for a First Draw PPP Loan if they were in operation on February 15, 2020, and fall into one of the following categories: Businesses with 500 or fewer employees that are eligible for other SBA 7(a) loans. Eligible self-employed individuals (including sole proprietors and independent contractors). Non-profit organizations, including churches. Accommodation and food services operations with no more than 500 employees per location. Sec. 501(c)(6) business leagues with no more than 300 employees that do not receive more than 15% of its income from lobbying. Qualifying news organizations with 500 or fewer employees per location. Second Draw PPP Loan Eligibility Existing PPP participants are generally eligible for a Second Draw PPP Loan if the borrower: Used or will have used its First Draw PPP Loan as authorized. Has no more than 300 employees. Can prove it has suffered at least a 25% reduction in gross income between the same quarters in 2019 and 2020. Our team is committed to monitoring new developments with the PPP and providing you with the information you need. It is essential that your small business consults with knowledgeable corporate attorneys , financial advisors, and accountants on your PPP eligibility and forgiveness applications. If you have any questions about the new eligibility requirements or any other issues involving the PPP, please feel free to call or email us.
By nat rosasco June 5, 2020
Many businesses that received Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) funds are coming to the end of their respective eight-week time periods (“Expenditure Period”) during which they must use the PPP funds to obtain forgiveness under the CARES Act. Unfortunately, many of these businesses have found it difficult to reopen and remain fully operational throughout the Expenditure Period and consequently to meet spending thresholds necessary to obtain full forgiveness. Luckily for these businesses, some much needed flexibility is on its way. Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act On June 5th, the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act (“PPPFA”) was signed into law. The PPPFA made the following changes relevant to PPP loan forgiveness: Extends the Expenditure Period from eight weeks to the earlier of twenty-four weeks from the date of the loan origination or December 31, 2020. Reduces the required payroll spending amount to a minimum of 60% on payroll instead of the current 75% minimum requirement. This would allow businesses to use the remaining 40% of the PPP funds on rent and other operational items as needed. Extends the deadline for workers to be able to be rehired to December 31, 2020 instead of the current cutoff of June 30, 2020. Extends the PPP loan to a five-year term instead of the current two-year term. As any amendments governing the use and repayment of PPP loans may be vital to a small business’ ability to continue to operate and successfully plan for the future, our team will continue to keep you up to date on the on-going developments. As always, it is important to consult with informed attorneys, financial advisors, bankers and accountants on how best to use your PPP funds. Should you have any questions, don’t hesitate to call or email us.
Show More